Joy and Hope

November 8, 2011 § 5 Comments

In my last post, I’m afraid I sounded a bit angry.  Just a tad.  In this post, however, I am hopeful and excited.  Joyful, really.  You see, in case some readers were not aware, the Catholic Mass is going to change soon.  Beginning in Advent (Nov. 27th, exactly), some of the prayers, songs, and people’s responses will be worded differently.  This is not just a random “change”.   It’s more of a reverting back to the Latin translation.  All our English responses were translated from Latin in the first place, so the “new” translation isn’t so much a remaking as it is a clarifying process.  The committee is making the new translation closer to the old Latin.  As Archbishop José H. Gomez says:

“This is not a new Mass. It is a new translation of the ancient Latin prayers of the Mass.”

I am so excited to see these new prayers put into practice!  Detractors go on and on about the “archaic” and “melodramatic” language but I find it to be neither of those things.  The language instead seems more formal, more eloquent to me.  And why shouldn’t we have the best possible language in our Mass?  In the Catechism of the Church, it says the Eucharist is “the source and summit of our Christian life”.  The source.  The summit.  Those are potent words.  Those are strong words.  And so should the words of the Mass be.  Strong, potent, bold.  Meaningful.  If the new translation gets us closer to that, who could complain?   The liturgy should not be dumbed down to nothing but “God loves you and God loves me and we’re all good people” vacuousness.  Certainly, God loves us!!  This is evident in the Mass itself!  The sacrifice of Christ on Calvary is the ultimate expression of Love.  Don’t make me endure a Mass full of vapidity because liberal Catholics think words like consubstantial and incarnate are just too hard for us ox-like commoners to understand.   (Oh drat, there I go sounding angry again.)  Would you meet the President of the United States and talk in slang to him?  Would you have tea with the Queen like you were texting your buddy?  Would you propose to your girlfriend by saying “Babe, let’s like get married, maybe?  If you’re cool with that?”   No.  You wouldn’t propose like that.  You would use the best possible language/meaning you had to make that moment of love even more perfect.  At Mass, we as Catholics believe that Christ, our Saviour, Love Incarnate, is truly Present.  If the language is more poetic and old-fashioned, all the better!  Use words that have meaning, that MATTER.   

Words.  Matter.

The language of our liturgy should reflect the awesome (and I use that word in its real meaning)  and magnificent and humbling Sacrifice that is occurring.  This is what the new translation is attempting to do.  Not alienate.  Not confuse.  Not upset.  To provide the proper reverence and awe for what is taking place.  To quote the same article by Archbishop Gomez as above, he says:

“There is an ancient principle in the Church: lex orandi, lex credendi — the law of prayer is the law of faith. That means that the words we pray — and how we pray them — shape what we believe and how we live out our beliefs.  We become what we pray.”

Here is a great article, well worth reading if you aren’t sure why you should be excited for the new translation to come.  It’s by Bishop Peter J. Elliott (Auxiliary Bishop of Melbourne) and he really goes in-depth as to the richness of the language we will begin using.  He says things much better than I can. 

“The new ICEL translations reflect not only accuracy but reverence for the mystery of God, indeed the centrality of God, which is the meaning of Christian worship. To elucidate this, we may compare the two translations of the opening words of the First Eucharistic Prayer, the Roman Canon.

The ICEL text that we currently use begins: “We come to you, Father, with praise and thanksgiving through Jesus Christ your Son. Through Him we ask you to accept and bless these gifts we offer you in sacrifice”.

By contrast the new ICEL text begins: “To you, therefore, most merciful Father, we make humble prayer and petition, through Jesus Christ, your Son our Lord: that you accept and bless these gifts, these offerings, these holy and unblemished sacrifices…”

The old text is smooth, shorter, with good words, but they have nothing to do with the Latin original, the majestic “Te igitur clementissime Pater” of the venerable Roman Canon. There the emphasis is on God and how the divine actio liturgica, liturgical action, flows out of the Sanctus and Preface, hence the “igitur”, now recaptured in English as “therefore”. Notice how the new version captures the spiritual sense of reserve and humility before God that characterizes the great liturgies of the West and East.”

One of the changes that has drawn most of the ire I’ve read about in the US, is that when the priest says: “The Lord be with you”, we will now respond “And with your spirit.”  The commentary on the USCCB page explains in depth why this response has changed.  There are several reasons, but I really appreciate this one in particular:

“…for the congregation to answer the Priest, “And with your spirit,” is actually a theological statement about what we Catholics believe regarding ordained ministers.  No. 367 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church speaks of how “spirit” can refer to an elevation of the soul, whereby the soul “is raised beyond all it deserves to communion with God.”  Through Holy Orders, Christ has forever configured the Priest’s soul to Himself in a special way, by the power of the Holy Spirit.  By specifically referencing the Priest’s spirit, we can affirm this transformation and pray for his ministry.”

That is wonderful!  I like that… “we can affirm this transformation and pray for his ministry”.  I know so many good priests, and guys in the seminary right now, and I pray for their ministry every day.  This new translation hits home for me, even more than the old response did.   

There are many more changes and I would like to go into each one to say how I think it will improve my participation in the Mass, but that would make this post way too long.  And honestly, I can’t do it justice.  Read the commentary on the USCCB website.  They have better explanations than I could give. 

In this new translation, I hear a language of reverence, of awe, and an acknowledgment that here in the Eucharist is contained the mystery of faith, the nourishment of our Catholic souls.  As Pope Paul VI proclaimed in his encyclical “Mysterium Fidei”:

“The Catholic Church has always devoutly guarded as a most precious treasure the mystery of faith, that is, the ineffable gift of the Eucharist which she received from Christ her Spouse as a pledge of His immense love…”  

Advertisements

Tagged: ,

§ 5 Responses to Joy and Hope

  • Callie says:

    As your dear friend, I thoroughly enjoy hearing your rantings and ravings especially discussing the Church and other theological issues. I thoroughly enjoyed this post because you pumped up my spirits about the new translations. Not that I didn’t enjoy the previous post because, trust me, I could hear your voice inside my head as I read through your “angry” rant, and I miss that dearly. But this post gives me a reason to be excited, not just angry.

    Advent is approaching in a few short weeks and I honestly haven’t prepared myself for the new translations at all. I didn’t really have an opinion other than “this is new.” I’m excited now to know how mature, traditional, and reverent the new translations are.

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts, rants, and raves Rose! I thoroughly appreciate ALL of it!

    • shortside40 says:

      Thank YOU, Callie!! Your texts were the reason I decided to clarify my anger in a second post, one with a much more positive note. Keep being open to grace. 😉 And get excited! The new translation is going to be awesome.

  • Mary Cay says:

    did someone say tad?

  • Mom says:

    Rose, I enjoyed reading this and found it cogent, lucid and substantial, and I did NOT have to look up the meaning of any of those words. Really, though, what’s wrong with having to look up a word anyway? What would be wrong with finding a word that describes God and savoring it? Words DO matter. Do we think every word about God can fit into an abbreviation for a text message? ROFL Perhaps that’s a root of the disgruntledness. Savoring words is being lost in the text messaging era of abbreviations. Here’s a quote from PJP2 that I think describes with dignity the journey we need to be on. “In the far reaches of the human heart there is a seed of desire and nostalgia for God…There is therefore a path which the human being may choose to take, a path which begins with reason’s capacity to rise beyond the contingent and set out toward the infinite.” Apparently, the pope thought we had the capacity to learn, to stretch, to go further…IMO BWDIK SMH…Mom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Joy and Hope at findingsomethingbetter.

meta

%d bloggers like this: